Sunday, March 18, 2018

The Hour (John 12:20 -33)




      Have you ever just felt it was time?  That the moment had come?  That whatever you’d been waiting for, or whatever you had to do, its time had arrived?  That’s happened to me before . . . when I began thinking seriously about seminary, Pam and Mike and I went to one of Columbia Seminary’s Inquirer weekends, where they clean up the campus, trot out their best-looking students and put on a dog-and-pony show, and we were duly impressed and all, but when we came back, we’d decided that we’d have to postpone it indefinitely, that we weren’t in a position to do it right away . . . and then, that Summer, I went to Africa, and everything changed, and when I came back, I knew that it was time, that we should go sooner, rather than later . . . and looking back on it, I can see the things that propelled us forward, though it was harder at that time . . .

      Jesus had a keen sense of the moment, a keen sense of when it was time . . . back at the wedding at Cana, when his mama came to him and told him “They have no wine,” Jesus said “Woman, what concern is that to you and to me?  My hour has not yet come” . . . and Mary – I imagine with a heavy sigh – said “Do whatever he tells you.”  And the hands of people plotting against him were stayed twice because, as John tells us, his hour—his Kairos, his time—had not yet arrived.  But now, Jesus can see the writing on the wall, he knows that it’s time, that in his words “The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified,” and as usual, the disciples didn’t have a clue, but looking back on it, we can see what must have prompted him . . . things were closing in:  the temple authorities were planning to kill him and just ten verses ago, they’d planned to put poor old Lazarus to death because he’d been raised from the dead by Jesus.  At the same time, increasingly large numbers of people were coming to him, and we know it wasn’t supposed to happen that way, that his glorification wasn’t until after the cross, that it didn’t mean earthly crowds following him around and praising him – not just yet, anyway.  Even the Pharisees were aware of it – they’d iust said they could do nothing because “the whole world has gone after him.”  And as if to prove them right, along come some Greeks – they represent the nations, those who are other-than-Jewish – some Greeks come to worship at Passover, and they ask to see him.  They’re not satisfied with just the signs, or hearing about him – they want to experience the man himself.  And the coming of the Greeks, the flocking of the nations to him is the final sign that things are coming to a head, and he tells them the hour has come.

      Last week we read about Jesus “being lifted up” – as in on a cross – and exalted, and we said a key to the whole thing, at least here in John, is people seeing for themselves the word of God, and even though the disciples didn’t understand the double meaning of being lifted up and displayed like the bronze serpengt, we do . . . and we know that Jesus’ glorification is a double-edged sword, that for him it entailed being nailed to a cross and suffocating to death . . . and he goes on to explain it with agricultural language – “unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.”  Although we know different, the ancients believed that a planted seed actually dies before it germinates, so what he’s saying is that unless a seed is planted, unless it dies, it will not bear fruit.  And of course, he’s talking about his own death, which he now knows is eminent.

      But what does he mean by “fruit?”  Carrying the metaphor further, a seed produces a tree or a grapevine, which produces generation after generation of fruit . . . and the fruit in each generation are connected to every other fruit by branches, via their connection to the central stalk or trunk . . . and later on in John, Jesus likens himself to that central stalk, and so the picture of what Jesus’ death produces is a tree, or a vine, bearing fruit, with Christ at the center of it all . . . and notice that fruit on a tree are not independent, all are connected to each other through the stalk, all are connected through Christ.  Notice that this is a picture of the church, not individual salvation.  What Jesus will produce by his glorification – by his lifting-up/exaltation – is the church.  And we in the church are like the individual fruit – we are in relationship one with another, in communion with one another, and we’re all held together by Christ.

      But what is the mode of operation of this community?  How are they to function in this arrangement?  How are Christians to live in a community centered on Christ?  Well, the first hint is in Jesus’ next line, that those who love their life will lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life . . . here the Greek word for life is psyche – and does that ring a bell?  It means more than just physical life, it means “self” or “soul” or “being,” and so participation in this connected community of Christians entails not loving yourself, not being self-centered, or psyche-centered . . . and it makes sense, doesn’t it?  How can our lives be centered in Christ if they are centered upon ourselves?  How can we be Christ-centered if we are George-centered or Kate-centered or Rick-centered?  And those who would serve Christ, and not the self, must needs follow Christ, and they will be with him wherever he goes . . . they will be with him eternally . . . and God will honor them . . .

      And so the promise of Christ is the promise of relationship with Christ and through Christ—who after all, is the glue, the divine core of all creation—the entire created—and uncreated—realm.  And it’s no less a relationship with our fellow Christians, our fellow fruit on the branches of the Christ-tree. . . we are caught up together in the eternal, Trinitarian dance of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, the Creator, the Redeemer and the One Who Comforts and empowers, weaving and bobbing in a resurrection two-step, in the intricate romp of life . . . but there is pain there as well, there is pain and grief and heartache . . . for loss is our constant companion – and is it God’s as well?  Surely Jesus felt it, we hear his pain in the Garden – take this cup, father – and right here in our passage as well . . . his soul, his psyche is troubled . . . “shall I say:  Father, save me from this hour?”  Save me from the agony to come?  But no, he says, no it is for this hour that I have come . . . and acknowledging the necessity, he cries out to heaven: “Father, glorify your name.”  Immediately, there is booming, crashing . . . and the people say that it’s thunder, or an angel, but Jesus knows better . . . Jesus knows that it’s God, affirming God’s will . . . I will glorify my name, says the thunder, and Jesus’ knows it’s a death-knell.

      From the death of Jesus, comes the life of the church, the life of Christians everywhere, and this tension, this sublime paradox of life from death, from pain and suffering, is at the center of the Christian walk, and perhaps all of human existence, as well . . . and we’ve all been there, we’ve all felt so low, so depressed that no matter what we did, no matter how we acted, we couldn’t pull out of it.  T.S. Elliot called these times the “lesser deaths”; theologian Teilhard de Chardin called them “diminishments.”  Sometimes we’re so down it’s almost physically painful, and our inclination is to keep ourselves busy, to frantically get involved with something, to get to work, to take our minds off it . . . but that just prolongs the pain, and it sneaks up on little cat’s feet and smacks us with claws extended, full in the face . . .

      Little deaths almost always involve loss – loss of a loved one, loss of face, loss of our own sense of self, of who we are . . . the ancients tell a story of a mother whose little boy dies, and she is wild with grief, just inconsolable with it, and all her friends try to help her, they try to comfort her, but she tells them that unless her son is brought back to life, she cannot be consoled.  So she goes to the doctor, but he can’t help, and she goes to the village elder, but she sends her away, and finally she comes upon the hut of an old monk, living deep in the forest, and she asks him if he can bring her son back to life, and he says “Certainly,” and she cries out “What do I have to do?” and the monk says “Go back to the village, and bring me a cup of milk from a family that has never known suffering.”  And she thinks of all her happy neighbors – certainly much happier than she – and thinks “This ought to be easy,” but as she goes from house to house she hears tales of grief and sorrow from even the liveliest families, she hears story after story of pain and heartache. No matter how full of life they seem, it has not always been that way.  And so she goes back to the Monk and he asks her “Could you not find one family without suffering to give you a glass of milk?”  “No,” she says “and now I understand that there’s no life without suffering, and no suffering that cannot be overcome.”

      Our bright and shiny culture teaches us to avoid pain, it tells us that suffering is altogether bad, and you should avoid it at all costs, and there’s plenty of products out there to help us in this effort, to help those who can afford it, anyway . . . and if suffering should come, doggone it, you just go see your favorite doctor and he’ll give you something that’ll ease that pain, and if he won’t, there’ll be someone who will, who’ll take care of it for you.  But suffering is woven into the fabric of life . . . we can no more avoid the little deaths than we can our final death.  And I think that it’s up to us how we respond, what we make of it.  We’ve all known people who’ve been eaten up inside . . . they seem to collapse in on themselves.  We try to comfort, we use words like “I know how you feel” or “It’s always darkest before the dawn,” but it doesn’t help, and they become a shell of their former selves, their former psyches.  People recover in their own times, or sometimes not at all.

      But the Jesus-story is emblematic of the universal, because from his death came life.  From his story came the church, and the eternal connection of its members one with another, held together by the cosmic Christ.  And Christ’s story is the seminal story, the basic story, maybe the basic story of creation . . . it’s etched in the seasons, in the following of day from night, day from night.  And it’s through this basic story, and through our realization of Christ at the center of it all, that we can begin to deal with all the little deaths, all the heartache and pain, that lead up to that final day.  Paul called it hope, and just as we have hope of our final resurrection, we can have hope that from our sufferings, new life can spring.  All we have to do is keep our eyes on the prize, keep our eyes on Christ.

      Now, I know that this sounds like a load of pious clap-trap, like “suffer the pains and sorrows of this vale of tears, in hopes of eternal life by-and-by” . . .  and while that’s true, we can learn to see the life from our little deaths a bit sooner than that . . . we can learn to listen for Christ, to listen to Christ who is, after all, in everything.  And although there are many ways of putting it, I like the way St. Benedict framed it almost fifteen-hundred years ago.  It’s embedded in his whole philosophy, but best seen in the three Benedictine vows.  The vows of stability, obedience, and change of life . . . we are to remain in our grief, to own it, not avoid it, but at the same time listen – which is the basic meaning of obedience – to the voice of God in everything around us.  We’re to listen to the whisper in the trees . . . life . . . life . . . life, and the babble of our friends and neighbors, who are, after all, Christ to us, and by-and-by we’ll learn the way out, the way of life, what form new life is to take . . . and then, we’re to let God move us there, be open to the change in our lives, the new life in whatever form it is presented.

      What form this new life takes varies with each of us, and with the particular form of diminishment we experience – Christ, after all, loves us as individuals.  Whenever I do something truly stupid – it happens a lot – I have a tendency to brood over it, to wrestle with it, to be depressed over it, sometimes for days.  But if I can manage to keep open to Christ, he will show me the way of life.  Many times, it’s a life-lesson, something I have to take to heart, to learn.  In the case of grief over a lost loved one, new life may simply be a dawning acceptance, an accommodation, literally a new life without the deceased.

Whatever the case, whatever the circumstance, Jesus has shown us the way, he has demonstrated it in his life, and in his death, and in his coming resurrection.   He has shown us the way of life, and fashioned for us a new creation . . . because from his death comes the Church, the body of Christ on earth, and the connection of all believers one to another, and to Christ our redeemer through all eternity.  Amen.

No comments:

Post a Comment