You ever
notice how politicians return to their home towns to announce their
candidacies? It makes for great
photo-ops, there against the backdrop of their childhood … with spouse and
kiddies and mama and daddy there, smiling adoringly up at their loved one,
little suspecting what a chore it’s going to be in just a few short months:
smiling adoringly, smiling adoringly, smiling adoringly . . . and they never quite see it coming, when the
unending pressure of press scrutiny scrapes up something embarrassing from the
past. We’ve got a very bad habit of lynching
our politicians and other luminaries for having feet of clay, for being human
beings which, last time I checked, most of them are.
But at the
start of their campaigns, there on their own home turf, where the press will
throw them softballs, where there are loving crowds of friends and family
looking on, wanting a President or a Senator or Congressman from their own
town, maybe thinking of all the pork that’s gonna come their way, all the
public works projects or no-bid contracts at the local defense plant . . . I
remember Bill and Hillary and Chelsea, beaming for the cameras in Hope,
Arkansas—he was the man from
Hope! But that was before Monica and
Gennifer and the disillusion of millions . . . I remember W and Laura and the
girls there in Crawford, all optimism and confidence, looking young and fresh
and ready. Of course, that was before
the press savaged the girls for sowing some wild oats, and before some
airplanes hit some towers in New York.
But there on
that day, in that place, it was a sweetheart deal for each of the future first
families, and it must have felt good to them . . . That’s not exactly how it was for Jesus . . .though
it’s outside our reading, it’s important to remember that not too long after his
reading in the synagogue, they run him out of town on a rail, or more
accurately, try to throw him off a cliff.
So much for the hometown crowd.
He quotes from
Isaiah, from one of the “messianic passages,” then very deliberately rolls up
the scroll, hands it to the attendant, and sits down. And Luke says all eyes were upon him, and then
he begins to say to them “Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.” And most of the time, we read that and say:
“There. He’s announced who he is,
revealed his messianic-ness,” and maybe—though he says some other things
too—maybe that has something to do with why they get mad. I know I’ve preached
something like that in the past. But
scholar Gil Bailie points out that a careful reading shows differently: Luke tells us he begins to say “Today this scripture has been fulfilled . . .” not that he says it. He sees
that all eyes are upon him, all are attentive—after all, he is well-spoken and
gracious, and a local boy to boot—and he starts to tell them who he is, but he doesn’t.
And it begs
the question: why? Why didn’t he tell
them he was the fulfillment of the scripture he’d just read from Isaiah? All eyes were
upon him, it was the perfect time, there couldn’t have been any better to
announce his ministry . . . it would have been as if Clinton or Bush had gotten
this big ol’ crowd together, talked about their presidential heritage, maybe evoking
the ghost of Lincoln like they all do, but instead of going ahead and
announcing their candidacies, they wave at the crowd, get into their limos and
drive off. All eyes are on Jesus, and he
starts to take advantage of it, starts to announce his candidacy for Messiah, but
he doesn’t.
And to understand why not, we need to invoke
the “C-word.” That’s the context-word, in
case you were wondering.. Stories like this were never meant to be read in
isolation, by themselves. On the
contrary, they always relate to what comes before and after. And in this
case, the relevant passage is the one right before, when the Holy Spirit drives
him into the wilderness, and Ol’ Scratch presents him with three
temptations. And without going into
detail—we’ll likely do that in a few weeks—all three in some way tempt him to
grasp for power, to take authority over the world and all that’s in it, to
exercise his power as Son of God to become rich and famous and drink Latte’s
all the time. And here, in the very next
passage, is yet another temptation: messianic fever is vibrating throughout the
land, he’s just read from one of passages responsible, and all eyes are glued
on him. There will never be a better
time to tell them who he is, to declare his Messiah-hood, but he doesn’t.
At the end of
the wilderness story, Luke says that the devil left him until an opportune
moment, and I always assumed it’s meant to be at the end, when they crucify
him, but maybe not. Maybe the reason
Luke puts this story where he does, right after the wilderness episode, is that
he wants to subtly remind us that temptation lurks everywhere. In the synagogue that day, all eyes were upon
him, they were his homies, his people, and they would have followed him
anywhere. He could have led them off, to
a glorious revolution or the beginning of a new movement, but no. He begins to tell them who he is, that he has
come to do all of that, but he doesn’t.
And at first,
he gets away with it, at first his fellow Nazarenes say “Wow, he speaks very well
for a carpenter’s son,” but as he continues to teach—and it’s only after
pointing out that God sent two of their most famous prophets, Elijah and Elisha, to their enemies from Sidon
and Syria, do they get mad and try to throw him off a cliff.
But if they
had listened carefully—and maybe it sat there in the back of their minds and
they didn’t notice until he got more specific—they could have inferred it from what he read in
Isaiah. Or rather: what he didn’t read.
Here’s the passage that he was reading,
from Isaiah’s 61st chapter:
The spirit of
the Lord GOD is upon me, because the LORD has anointed me; he has sent me to
bring good news to the oppressed, to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim
liberty to the captives, and release to the prisoners; to proclaim the year of
the LORD's favor,
And what I just read was Isaiah chapter 61, the entirety of verse 1 and the first part of verse 2, verse 2a as we would list it in a bible lesson. What Jesus didn’t read was 2b, the part that comes right after. If he’d continued, he’d have read “the Spirit has anointed me . . . to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor, and the day of vengeance of our God.”
I don’t think
it’s a coincidence that he leaves that off, do you? Isaiah—like many other ancient prophets and
theologians—thought that right along with doing good for God’s people, God would
wreak vengeance upon their enemies. Revenge. Retaliation.
But Jesus—whom we believe is the incarnation of the divine—spent his entire
life embodying just the opposite. His
whole life as the Son of Man was spent forgiving and even healing those who
were the enemies of his people. He spent
his whole time on earth demonstrating—through his example as Son of the most
high—that there was nothing of vengeance in God.
And so in a
sense, the Good News that he talks about is not just freeing the oppressed, not just
recovery of sight to the blind—though it surely includes all these things—but what
he leaves unsaid as well, and what he
demonstrates just a few lines later by refusing to give in to the temptation of
declaring his Messiah-hood and becoming a tool of human vengeance. God, whom
Jesus called his Abba, is not a God of vengeance, not a deity of retaliation,
not a God of revenge. The year of God’s
favor is a year of favor to everyone,
Jews and gentiles alike, friends of Israel and those who oppose it as well.
When Katrina
hit New Orleans, some of our more, how shall we say it, fundamental
brothers and sisters said that God
was punishing the city for its tolerance of gays. Overlooking, apparently, the fact that God
must’ve had a bad aim, because God spared the French Quarter where they all
hang out. Three years and change after that,
an earthquake that killed upwards of 100,000 people in Haiti brought ‘em
all back out of the woodwork, the most famous being Pat Robertson, God bless
him, who opined that the earthquake was, and I quote, “God’s vengeance upon the
Haitians for making a deal with the devil to rid themselves of the French.” He was apparently
referring to a folk tale—that even most of Haiti’s Christians considered
mythological—that the country’s founders did a deal with the Devil,
Robert-Johnson style, to get the French off their backs. And although I think it’s an insult to Isaiah
to compare him to Robertson, there is definitely some of the old
vengeance-thinking to these remarks by founder of The 700 Club. Rather than their poverty being due to a
sinful and corrupt government, and the ‘quake to shifting tectonic plates, God
is actually bringing God’s vengeful wrath upon those poor people.
But here’s the
problem: we’re on the other side of
the Old Testament. The whole point of the incarnation is that God
becomes one of us, and showed us what it means to live as the perfect human, as
one perfectly in tune with the spirit of God who dwells within. Jesus is like a filter: he filters out all the
human-borne ideas of the divine, all the historically-conditioned notions that
God is like us in desiring vengeance,
in wreaking bloody retribution. Jesus
showed—in this passage and in his whole life—that God is not a God of vengeance, not a God of revenge. The Lord God Almighty is a God of
forgiveness, of compassion.
And it’s a
good thing for Robertson, saying that crazy stuff that God can’t have been too
fond, of and it’s a good thing for us. The God of forgiveness, the God who is love, forgives
Robertson for saying those stupid things, just as he forgives us for all the dumb things we do, for
all those times when through our acts of rebellion and contrariness we have
impeded the work of God. God forgives us
for all the hateful things we might have said, all the things that hurt our
fellow Christians, all the times we have not treated our neighbor as
ourselves. The God we worship, the one
true God, does not seek vengeance, does not seek retribution, but forgives us
just as we are. Hallelujah! Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment