The Presbyterian Church has designated
today as Immigration Sunday, and the timing couldn’t be better. In fact, given
that it was scheduled some time ago, long before the current mess, proves that
even our own stodgy denomination can be prophetic once in a while. In the last
weeks we’ve been treated to images of children crying alone after being ripped
away from their parents, toddlers in cages and detention centers—a slightly
nicer term than “concentration camps”—blooming in the wastelands. That has been
the straw that broke the proverbial camel’s back. Even though the policy of
separating children from parents was overridden by executive decree, the images
have been burned into the national psyche, and there’s no plan to reunite the 2400
children still being held in the camps anytime soon.
Now, to complement the images of
children alone in the camps, we have stories told by volunteers lawyers about
their toddler clients—some as young as three—who are in immigration hearings by
themselves, stories about their clients climbing on the table, bursting into
nursery songs at the drop of a hat. The stories might be charming if the
circumstances were less horrific, to wit: young children on trial. Alone,
without anybody they know nearby.
Politicians and talking heads on all
sides are always going on about what a complex issue immigration is, and I
suppose that’s true, at least in the sense that there are a lot of moving
parts. There are questions of refugees, asylum seekers, so-called “illegal”
immigration, immigration quotas, border security, and I think it’s safe to say
that it’s the
defining political issue of the day, and will have a huge part to play in our
elections for some time to come. And we who call ourselves Christians have two
basic options: Option A, which is to put our heads in the sand and stand behind
our duly-appointed government’s actions on the issue, and that’s certainly
safe, it won’t ruffle any feathers, it won’t cause any fights or lose anybody
any members.
But there’s another way to respond,
we’ll call it Option B, and that’s to discern a Biblical response to the
problem, and then and follow it, advocate
for it, do something about it.
It’s not as safe as Option A, but perhaps a bit more satisfying . . . after
all, it assumes that our faith means something more than just fire insurance, or providing a
place to come and feel good for a couple of hours a week. It means putting our
faith in action, joining tens of millions of Christians world-wide who attempt
to follow Christ’s mission statement, which is found in Luke, Chapter 4: bring
good news to the poor, proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight
to the blind, and to let the oppressed go free.
Where we ever got the notion that
Christianity was supposed to be safe and warm and fuzzy I have no idea. They killed prophets, for Pete’s
sake, and crucified Jesus. They hounded Paul from one end of the Mediterranean
to the other, and martyred him during Nero’s great purge. John the Baptist was
beheaded after questioning the Emperor’s morals,
aka sleeping with his brother’s wife. Perpetua was trampled by a bull and, when
that didn’t kill her, beheaded
for speaking about her faith. Dietrich Bonhoeffer was executed for opposing the
lawfully elected leader of his government. And thousands more, all killed while
living out their faith; not one
of them worried about being too political, or mixing politics with faith.
For at least the length of this sermon,
let’s follow Option B. First, Scripture, for one, is unambiguous as to how
immigrants should be treated. Both the Old and New Testaments tell compelling
stories of refugees forced to flee their homelands because of oppression.
Exodus tells the story of the people of Israel, who were victims of slavery in
Egypt. They were utterly helpless by themselves, but with God’s intervention,
enabled to escape and take refuge in the desert where they lived as refugees
for forty years. The Israelites’ experience was so painful, so
frightening, that God ordered his people for all time to have special care for
the stranger. It’s recorded in the book of Leviticus: “When an alien resides
with you in your land, do not mistreat such a one. You shall treat the alien
who resides with you no differently than the natives born among you; you shall
love the alien as yourself; for you too were once aliens in the land of Egypt”.
Notice the use of the same word we use: “alien,” only we often precede it with the
pejorative “illegal.”
As a child, Jesus was a refugee, fleeing with his family to
Egypt. And note that it was for the same reason that many seek asylum on our
southern borders: they feared for their lives, running from a government hit
squad. And though I don’t know about the Egyptians’ motives—they weren’t known for their kind-hearted
treatment of visitors—I do
know they didn’t send them back to face certain death, nor did they take Jesus
away from Mary and Joseph and put him in a cage. And when Jesus grew up, he was
an itinerant wanderer, a kind of perpetual immigrant, trudging from one nation
to another: “Foxes have holes, birds have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere
to lay his head.”
As an adult, he advocated unequivocally
for the values of God, whom he called Abba: one of his core sayings was “love your
neighbors as yourself,” which he elaborated over in Matthew when he said
“whatever you do to the least of these, you’ve done it to me “ And children on
trial without their parents, children in cages
without their parents, anybody
fleeing persecution and near-death, and anybody desperate enough for food and
shelter to pay a smuggler
to sneak them across the border qualifies as the least of these in my book. And Jesus makes it clear that we will be judged
by how we fulfill this mission, how we feed and water and shelter the strangers
among us.
Then there’s the summary statement of
Jesus’ entire mission: “In everything do to others as you would have them do to
you; for this is the law and the prophets.” How many of us would want our
neighbors to do unto us
as we’re doing to our Southern neighbors? How many would like them to forcibly
separate us from our children, to send families back to be murdered in their
beds, or to face sure starvation? Can I have a show of hands?
Not only did Jesus preach inclusive justice but
he practiced it as
well: he healed the child of the Syrophoenician woman, certainly a stranger in
a strange land, and gave water to the Samaritan at the well. He told stories
about good
strangers to folks for whom the only good
stranger was one who was deceased. And he welcomed the little children into his
warm and forgiving lap, it didn’t matter where they were from or what their
parents had done.
You know, I often hear Romans 13 quoted
to justify obeying secular law: “Let every person be subject to the governing
authorities; for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities
that exist have been instituted by God.” Never mind that this has been used to
justify everything from feudalism to slavery to Apartheid, it is clear from his
life that Paul didn’t intend for this to mean laws that are unjust, that go
against the word of the Lord. As we’ve already noted, Paul disobeyed authority
right and left, refusing to knuckle under to orders to quit preaching the
fledgling Christian faith which was, remember, illegal until 313 CE. But Paul wasn’t the only
one: Peter was crucified upside down for breaking the law, and Christians were
routinely tortured and murdered for doing the same. Sometimes we say piously
that these people were martyred for their faith, but this kind of whitewashes
what they did. What actually happened
was that they were executed for disobeying the law, for preaching and
practicing an illegal
religion.
In all this, they were simply following
the Gospel, as embodied and modeled by Jesus himself, who had no problem
disobeying the law right, left and upside down. He disobeyed all kinds of laws
from working on the sabbath to eating with outsiders to driving those
hard-working businessmen off of the Temple grounds. And as we talked about a
few weeks ago, he often disobeyed the law in very public, in-your-face ways,
ways that Henry David Thoreau would label “civil disobedience.” So based on the
record of Scripture, the idea that Christians must obey all the laws of the
land, including those that go against the will of God, is just not tenable.
Well. We’ve just about covered the first
part of Option B—discerning the Christian stance—and it’s pretty simple,
really: treat the least of these, treat those tired and weary yearning to be
free, as you would treat Jesus if you met him on the street. Heck, treat anyone as you would treat
Jesus if you met him walking down the street. Treat the people trying to come
into this country to have a better life, treat those seeking asylum from brutal
governments, treat the children living in cages, without their parents
involvement or presence as you would treat Christ. In fact, do unto others as
you would have them do unto you . . . that
summarizes all the laws and all the prophets you ever heard of.
Now, on to the second part: doing
something about it. And this is where it gets personal, both in terms of us
individually and as a local community of Christ. I’ve done what you hired me to
do, and that’s interpret scripture to the best of my ability, and relate it to
y’all in words. But you know the saying: preach the Gospel in words, if
necessary, so I’ll tell you what I’m
doing, and invite you as individuals to join me. I’m working with two
organizations intimately concerned with immigration issues, one local with
national connections and one national with local connections. The local one is
the Intercommunity Justice and Peace Center (IJPC), headquartered in Over the
Rhine, and the national group is The Poor People’s Campaign, the revival of
Martin Luther King’s organization. Both are headed by Christians: IJPC by Roman
Catholic nuns; The Poor People’s Campaign, as in Dr. King’s day, is led by
clergy. Both are dedicated to grass-roots change through education and
demonstration. If you are not down with the latter, with public action, they
offer excellent educational opportunities, especially the local IJPC. Another
way to contribute is financially, because they are chronically short on funds.
I would be glad to introduce anyone interested to these organizations and help
them get involved.
Of course, there is another way to speak
out on the subject—really, anything
that you feel goes against the mission statement of Christ—and that is to vote. Although we in our
country believe—rightly—in separation of church and state, that doesn’t mean we
can’t bring our Christian convictions into the voting booth. Really, if we
believe in preaching the Gospel in words only if necessary, how can we not? So, what I do is
examine the platform of every candidate, regardless of political party, and
compare it to the mission statement: bring good news to the poor, proclaim
release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, and to let the
oppressed go free. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment